Golden Era for US Billionaires: How the Economic Structure Sustains Wealth Inequality
Among countless individuals in the United States, the economy over the past five years has been challenging. Expenses have escalated while pay remains unchanged. Steep mortgage rates have made homeownership a bleak prospect. The rate of unemployment has been gradually increasing.
The majority of individuals have reported they're delaying major life decisions, including starting a family or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a select few of people, the past five-year period couldn't have been more prosperous.
Wealth Explosion
The assets of the world's billionaires expanded 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even amid all the economic instability, the stock market has only continued to grow. This growth has mostly helped just a limited group of Americans: 10% of the population holds 93% of stock market wealth.
However unequal as this division seems, it's the financial structure working as it is existing today.
"Rich elites have acquired their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're acquiring senators and media outlets," stated wealth disparity expert Chuck Collins. "We're now entering this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are exploiting the system of inequality."
Mapping Economic Classes
To help others understand what exactly it means to be "affluent" in the US, Collins borrows a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, conceptualized the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Prosperity Village, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To update the concept, Collins classifies these "affluence districts" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a family earnings of at least $110,000 and an overall wealth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Altogether, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their lifestyles vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still sitting in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins said. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're flying in a private jet. That's a really distinct lifestyle. You fly private, you have no stakes in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system fails – you're set."
The Billionaireville Effect
The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's wealthiest. The power that this group has far surpasses those who are simply well-off, let alone the typical citizen who doesn't reside in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the activist mantra "abolish billionaires" fails to address the core issue and has a "hint of elimination" to it.
"It's the separation between private conduct and a system of rules," Collins said. "We should be focused on an economic system that channels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Wealth Accumulation Mechanisms
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins divides it into four parts: getting the wealth, protecting assets, policy control and hyper-extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think solely about the first step, Collins said. People can create a modest amount of wealth through establishing or managing a successful business, which could get them membership in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires substantial commitment and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their knowledge to ensure that the super rich are being strategic about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a extensive selection of tools such as trusts, offshore bank accounts, anonymous shell companies, charitable foundations and other vehicles to hold assets," he writes.
Government Power and Extreme Wealth Removal
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs government backing. Wealth of over $40m converts to political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and ensure continued growth.
The final phase is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "extreme removal" to describe how the wealthy have come to affect nearly every single part of an Americans' daily existence largely through investment firms, which allows wealthy individuals to fund private companies.
"Private equity is searching for those corners of the economy where they can extract value a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is stored in so few hands, and they can basically shift and say, 'Where else can we squeeze money out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs."
Actual Impacts
The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people paying more for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the suffering and anger of this kind of society can lead to serious unrest.
"The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being excluded [and] are financially struggling," Collins said, adding that right-leaning leaders have been good at tapping into a potent "phony populism".
Government Truth
The contradiction, Collins points out in his book, is that political leaders have appointed a succession of billionaires to administrative posts. Along with wealthy entrepreneurs who had brief but powerful roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other key positions for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This political landscape, along with help from political partners, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make lasting reductions for the wealthy and corporations.
The Path Forward
While political parties continue to argue that immigration and poor economic deals are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the alternative political group, which has also been captured by the billionaires and big money, be able to effectively tackle the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Left-leaning officials, he argues, know what policies are needed to "reverse the updraft of wealth", including deep changes to the tax system, raising the minimum wage and strengthening unions.
"It was so, so close, and the legislation really did reflect the will of the majority of people who really want lawmakers to fix some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Oligarchic power is not about creating so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something meaningful happen, but the institutional knowledge is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is hopeful that there can be change, but said it would require continuous government action.
"It may be sooner than expected that the balance shifts, and then it really is about sustaining a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this profound imbalance we're living in," he said. "We can fix this. It is addressable."